Did you know that the state of Michigan offers tax credits for the upkeep of historic-district homes? Neither did we. Even additions to a house qualify, as long as they’re approved. Apparently, tax cuts that just happen to benefit the rich disproportionately are too underhanded; better to go with specifically targeted ones.
This was brought to our attention by an opinion piece in The Ann Arbor News today, in which the following nightmare scenario is envisioned: the house across the street from your beautifully maintained century-old mansion is being covered with gauche vinyl. But wait - it gets much worse. “[T]he entire home is being converted into rental apartments.”
The writer argues for a historic district as a way of preventing this kind of catastrophe. Now, the vinyl would clearly be verboten under historic-district rules. But we weren’t aware that these ordinances also forbid the conversion of houses into apartments. Is this true? If so, then the impact of these districts on students has been greatly understated. The original News article mentioned only that fraternities and sororities might have to pay for expensive repairs.
So maybe it’s time for students to start paying more attention to the activities of the Historic District Commission. Of course, they can be a bit arcane. “Commissioner Bruner stated he preferred the ell gable at ninety degrees to the main gable for its look, water shedding capabilities, and historically - the ell would have a gable perpendicular to the roof,” runs one riveting excerpt. But sometimes they can tend toward high comedy, such as when two commissioners request that “the historic elements be incorporated without it looking old.”